Skip to main content

While most companies focus on data, only about 16% are ‘data-driven’

The Data Quality 2023 Study study reveals that a significant 34% of the organizations responding are at the ‘Data Aware’ stage, indicating they are in the initial phases of recognizing the importance of data but have not yet fully integrated it into their decision-making processes. 

However, the most advanced stage, ‘Data Driven’, where data is fully integrated into those processes at all organizational levels, is achieved by 16% of the respondents’ organizations. This stage represents the pinnacle of data maturity, where data is utilized as a critical asset for business strategy and operations. 

The study, compiled by SD Times and data quality and address management solution provider Melissa, garnered a total of 218 complete responses. The dataset provided a comprehensive overview of various aspects of data quality management, including challenges faced by organizations, time spent on data quality issues, data maturity levels within organizations, and the impact of international character sets. 

When it comes to the most common issue when managing data, international character sets are the most prevalent challenge, with 28.1% of respondents rating it as their primary data quality challenge. Interestingly, international character sets were very prominently listed as both very difficult and the least difficult challenges at their organization at  28% and 37.5%, respectively.

International character sets present unique challenges in data quality management, primarily due to the complexity and diversity of languages and scripts they encompass. One of the primary issues is encoding, where different standards such as UTF-8 or ASCII are required for various languages. 

Incorrect or mismatched encoding can result in garbled text, information loss, and complications in data processing and storage. Additionally, the integration and consolidation of data from multiple international sources can lead to inconsistencies and corruption, a problem especially pertinent in global organizations. 

The second and third most difficult challenges for organizations were incomplete data and duplicates, with 22% and 23%, respectively, of respondents rating it the highest difficulty score. 

This year’s study, the third of its kind, shows that organizations still struggle with the same issues they’ve been wrangling with over that time. “To me, this shows that organizations are still not understanding the problem on a macro level,” said David Rubinstein, editorial director of D2 Emerge, the parent company of SD Times. “There needs to be an ‘all-in’ approach to data quality, in which data architects, developers and the business side play a role in ensuring their data is accurate, up to date, available and fully integrated to provide a single pane of glass that all stakeholders can benefit from.”

According to the study, 54% of respondents indicated they are fully engaged in multiple areas of data quality. This suggests a comprehensive approach to data quality management, where professionals are involved in a range of tasks rather than specializing in just one area.

The key areas of involvement include Data Quality Management (48.9%), Data Quality Input (45.9%), and Data Integration (47.9%). 

Data Quality Management involves overseeing and ensuring the accuracy, consistency, and reliability of data. Data Quality Input focuses on the initial stages of data entry and acquisition, ensuring that data is correct and useful from the outset. Data Integration involves combining data from different sources and providing a unified view.

A smaller proportion of respondents, 33.6%, are involved in Choosing Data Validation API Services/API Data Quality Solutions, reflecting the technical aspect of ensuring data quality through application programming interfaces and specialized software solutions.

The post While most companies focus on data, only about 16% are ‘data-driven’ appeared first on SD Times.



from SD Times https://ift.tt/QkUc6xV

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Difference between Web Designer and Web Developer Neeraj Mishra The Crazy Programmer

Have you ever wondered about the distinctions between web developers’ and web designers’ duties and obligations? You’re not alone! Many people have trouble distinguishing between these two. Although they collaborate to publish new websites on the internet, web developers and web designers play very different roles. To put these job possibilities into perspective, consider the construction of a house. To create a vision for the house, including the visual components, the space planning and layout, the materials, and the overall appearance and sense of the space, you need an architect. That said, to translate an idea into a building, you need construction professionals to take those architectural drawings and put them into practice. Image Source In a similar vein, web development and design work together to create websites. Let’s examine the major responsibilities and distinctions between web developers and web designers. Let’s get going, shall we? What Does a Web Designer Do?

A guide to data integration tools

CData Software is a leader in data access and connectivity solutions. It specializes in the development of data drivers and data access technologies for real-time access to online or on-premise applications, databases and web APIs. The company is focused on bringing data connectivity capabilities natively into tools organizations already use. It also features ETL/ELT solutions, enterprise connectors, and data visualization. Matillion ’s data transformation software empowers customers to extract data from a wide number of sources, load it into their chosen cloud data warehouse (CDW) and transform that data from its siloed source state, into analytics-ready insights – prepared for advanced analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence use cases. Only Matillion is purpose-built for Snowflake, Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, and Microsoft Azure, enabling businesses to achieve new levels of simplicity, speed, scale, and savings. Trusted by companies of all sizes to meet

2022: The year of hybrid work

Remote work was once considered a luxury to many, but in 2020, it became a necessity for a large portion of the workforce, as the scary and unknown COVID-19 virus sickened and even took the lives of so many people around the world.  Some workers were able to thrive in a remote setting, while others felt isolated and struggled to keep up a balance between their work and home lives. Last year saw the availability of life-saving vaccines, so companies were able to start having the conversation about what to do next. Should they keep everyone remote? Should they go back to working in the office full time? Or should they do something in between? Enter hybrid work, which offers a mix of the two. A Fall 2021 study conducted by Google revealed that over 75% of survey respondents expect hybrid work to become a standard practice within their organization within the next three years.  Thus, two years after the world abruptly shifted to widespread adoption of remote work, we are declaring 20