Skip to main content

How to protect the fundamentals of open source

The concept and promise of open source has been around for decades. It’s thriving in the industry today. While commercialization strategies around open source continue to evolve and disrupt, purveyors of open-source software cannot lose sight of what makes it such a powerful force for innovation.

Looking back over the past 20 years of software development, it’s hard to overstate the impact of the open source community. Just about every category of software has been transformed by open source.

Businesses in an ever-growing list of industries have embraced open source. Major technology firms have recognized its value and are contributing to projects with financial support, resources, expertise and more. 

The wide acceptance of open source, however, makes it more vulnerable to regulatory and commercial influences that could undermine the very principles that have made it so valuable. To be sure, growth is tantamount to change – open source should evolve as it gains more influence in the tech and business worlds. At the same time, the fundamentals of open source should be preserved so it can continue to thrive as an engine of innovation. 

Fortunately, open source contributors, businesses and other organizations still have a strong grasp of open source fundamentals. The path forward won’t always be simple, but a future built on open source is clearly within sight. 

When you boil it down to the fundamentals, what is open source? The open source model is effectively Wikipedia for software, with developers from all backgrounds contributing and collaborating in the effort to provide free yet robust source material. It’s an important effort because it drives innovation – after all, there’s no innovation without experimentation, and you can’t experiment if it costs too much. 

Much of the change we’ve witnessed in the open source community has been unequivocally positive. The community of contributors is broader and more diverse than ever, with web designers and different types of engineers joining software developers in the effort. Major industries that were once hesitant to leverage open source, such as telecommunications, are now embracing it to keep up with the pace of innovation. 

Meanwhile, the emergence of the cloud served as a catalyst for growth, providing different avenues of commercialization. With the cloud, open source became not only grounds for innovation, but grounds for creating a sustainable business. Commercialization strategies have evolved to include providing enterprise support offerings, consulting services on top of open source software, as well as complementary proprietary products on top of it. 

The commercialization of open source led to the emergence of the “open core” dynamic, with vendors developing proprietary software on top of open source. Open core presents one way to accelerate innovation, though it can lead to vendor lock-in – a scenario at odds with the spirit of open source. Vendor lock-in is especially problematic as organizations embrace multi-cloud and hybrid cloud environments, where software products are expected to work seamlessly across platforms. 

The complexity of distributed systems also presents a challenge for open source. Once an organization has committed to a multi-cloud or hybrid cloud model, it needs software that can be integrated, operated, secured and brought into compliance in a distributed manner. That means you need to have layers of open source software that can run on top of each other. 

Luckily, many companies are already committed to averting these challenges with a commitment to the fundamental premise of open source: that you will be able to decide how to use it. Moreover, you can amplify open source usage by working with communities and contributing upstream. 

Security and stability are also more important than ever as open source becomes an integral part of a growing number of industries. Encouragingly, the community has stayed mindful of this challenge, leveraging tooling from different organizations such as the Cybersecurity Framework of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) . 

Another lingering threat is the misuse of intellectual property law. Patent infringement lawsuits can create uncertainty around open source projects, and they could hinder innovation. Not surprisingly, as open source has become more widely used and more successful, patent trolls have followed. Organizations like the Open Source Initiative have taken note.  

These challenges aren’t the responsibility of any one entity. Regulators can take meaningful steps, such as reforming intellectual property laws to curb the threat of trolls. But, it’s also up to academia, research institutions, companies and industries to ensure that regulators fully understand the dynamics at work so they can create new legal frameworks without squelching innovation. This interaction should unfold within the open source foundations serving as instrumental arenas where collective interests combine. 

The open source foundations offer the right venues where companies sustain the open source community by fostering collaboration through conferences and meetups. These gatherings act also as pivotal hubs where a comprehensive educational dynamic about the open source paradigm takes place. Ultimately, this paradigm acts as the catalyst, converting various drives and motivations into innovation excellence.

The existence of ongoing threats and challenges isn’t a condemnation of the vibrant open source community. Technology is and always has been a risky and stimulating business — open source is no different. Open source requires mindful support in order to thrive, and thrive it will.

The post How to protect the fundamentals of open source appeared first on SD Times.



from SD Times https://ift.tt/oiBWbxU

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Difference between Web Designer and Web Developer Neeraj Mishra The Crazy Programmer

Have you ever wondered about the distinctions between web developers’ and web designers’ duties and obligations? You’re not alone! Many people have trouble distinguishing between these two. Although they collaborate to publish new websites on the internet, web developers and web designers play very different roles. To put these job possibilities into perspective, consider the construction of a house. To create a vision for the house, including the visual components, the space planning and layout, the materials, and the overall appearance and sense of the space, you need an architect. That said, to translate an idea into a building, you need construction professionals to take those architectural drawings and put them into practice. Image Source In a similar vein, web development and design work together to create websites. Let’s examine the major responsibilities and distinctions between web developers and web designers. Let’s get going, shall we? What Does a Web Designer Do?

A guide to data integration tools

CData Software is a leader in data access and connectivity solutions. It specializes in the development of data drivers and data access technologies for real-time access to online or on-premise applications, databases and web APIs. The company is focused on bringing data connectivity capabilities natively into tools organizations already use. It also features ETL/ELT solutions, enterprise connectors, and data visualization. Matillion ’s data transformation software empowers customers to extract data from a wide number of sources, load it into their chosen cloud data warehouse (CDW) and transform that data from its siloed source state, into analytics-ready insights – prepared for advanced analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence use cases. Only Matillion is purpose-built for Snowflake, Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, and Microsoft Azure, enabling businesses to achieve new levels of simplicity, speed, scale, and savings. Trusted by companies of all sizes to meet

2022: The year of hybrid work

Remote work was once considered a luxury to many, but in 2020, it became a necessity for a large portion of the workforce, as the scary and unknown COVID-19 virus sickened and even took the lives of so many people around the world.  Some workers were able to thrive in a remote setting, while others felt isolated and struggled to keep up a balance between their work and home lives. Last year saw the availability of life-saving vaccines, so companies were able to start having the conversation about what to do next. Should they keep everyone remote? Should they go back to working in the office full time? Or should they do something in between? Enter hybrid work, which offers a mix of the two. A Fall 2021 study conducted by Google revealed that over 75% of survey respondents expect hybrid work to become a standard practice within their organization within the next three years.  Thus, two years after the world abruptly shifted to widespread adoption of remote work, we are declaring 20